Miles Davis For President Home RSS Archives About

Let's Talk Politics

I've been quiet about politics this election cycle for two chief reasons:

1) As I've said before, I'm not going to vote in the Democratic primary. None of the candidates support gay marriage, not supporting gay marriage is bigotry, I will not vote for a bigot. Therefore, I won't vote.

2) I've not been sure who I would vote for, even if (1) weren't an issue. You all know I was a Johnny E fan back in 2004, and even more so in 2006.

2007 changed that because a) it became clear that he would not win and consequently he began to sound more desperate and opportunistic and b) because, you know what, experience does matter. And while I appreciate him pulling the Democratic party to the left with his policy proposals, he's barely got mroe experience than Obama does, and I don't think Obama has a quarter enough experience to run the country. So, Johnny E was out (and we'll see later why he won't ever get back in). And I've never been an Obama supporter. His empty rhetoric and default position of compromise bother me.

(Say a guy wants to punch you in the face and you want to resolve this issue. Obviously you don't go in saying "Well, both sides have good points, so why don't I accept being punched in the face just a little? Is that an acceptable compromise?" Maybe that's what you end up with, but that's not where you fucking start. How about you start from the position of "I don't want to be punched in the face at all." How about that? That seems like a good starting place. And this is what the Democrats as a whole have done with settling for civil unions (separate but equal) rather than demanding gay marriage. And it seems to be Obama's default position, bargaining from the position of only wanting to get punched in the face a little.)

So Obama's out. Also: my favorite part of the ABC Democratic debate last Saturday was when Obama defended the usefulness/power/importance of rhetoric with... that's right, more rhetoric. (And due to the Ancient course I just took, he reminded me of some people: Sophists.)

But that debate was also the first time I felt like I had seen genuine political discourse on television, which was a welcome change. Obama said very little, Johnny did better, and Hillary kept pounding on the fact that she has a record of creating change. And that's when I accepted the fact that I had become a Hillary supporter months ago. That was just the final nail, as it were.

//

All this makes the events of the three days that followed even more interesting. Now, I was caught up in World of Warcraft all weekend so I didn't see much of this happen live (and, as I don't live in New Hampshire, didn't need to see it all play out live).

Apparently Hillary got choked up a little about how much she wanted to make this country a better place. Which, when I saw the footage, made me like her even more. But that's neither here nor there. There's been a lot of talk about the media reaction to Hillary's "crying" or "breakdown" or whatever. (It wasn't really any of those things, if you watch the tape.) And talk about how the media tried to bury her with it. And even was trying to bury her before that, too. Which I just accepted as a given: it makes a good story and good stories are what they want. (People forget how self-interested journalism is.) Anyway, I just accepted it, because mostly I saw the commentary on the Daily show about it and wrote it off. I've known for a while that Chris Matthews was a loud asshole, so I wasn't surprised that he was a loud asshole to/about senator Clinton.

But that's mostly because I didn't understand the extreme degree of Matthews' assholery. And so I give you Miles Davis for President's very first embedded video, because it's important that you actually see this for yourself:

(Or, well, because that's not working, go watch it on YouTube and come back. I'll wait.) 

So... yeah. He said that. Now I understand what people say when they tell me that people voted for Hillary because they were voting against Matthews and misogyny. Anyway, here's the article I culled that video from, an interesting compendium of related media-bits.

Also, remember how I said that Johnny E was out and we'd soon see why he'll never be back in? Well, in the Salon article on this whole thing (which is excellent, by the way, but will sound a little hysterical until you see what Matthews and others actually said/did) gives us this little nugget:

Such joy was there at Clinton's devolving journey from the front of the pack back to the primordial stew of high-strung, overwrought femininity that even her opponent John Edwards, a man who built his candidacy in part with the support of progressive women, felt free to get in on the fun, reacting to Clinton's show of feeling by telling reporters that a president needs to demonstrate "strength and resolve."

What senator Clinton showed was not a lack of resolve. It was strength of passion. Something I once saw in you, senator Edwards. Now, though, it's clouded through with opportunism and seething indignation. You sir, kind of suck. 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://milesdavisforpresident.net/blog-mt/mt-tb.fcgi/458

Comments


OK. I've got to back up my man Obama here and you will almost certainly NOT agree with me, but given that I am now somewhat of a political blog junkie and my dude is the most informed insanely political person I know, I feel I have at least SOME platform to speak from.

Look- here's my thing with Hilary. I agree that her "break down" wasn't a break down and was just a sincere display of her passion and the misogynistic reaction by Edwards and the media made me want to like her. But at the end of the day I just don't think Clinton is going to try to get progressive shit done. Even in the debate, another one of her shining moments where she perfectly encapsulates her "change" argument, she killed it for me with "we don't need to be giving our country false hopes". Cause you know what? I think the country needs to be shooting a bit high this time to feel like we're going to get out of the Bush presidency clusterfuck.

And I know you've never liked Obama, but here's my stance on it. Obama already has, and will, elecrtify American politics in a way no one has done in decades. He will and has mobilize youth, make people interested, all the things Dean was supposed to do in 2004 and didn't. Obama finally has. And while I don't happen to believe his rhetoric is empty (he started out as a civil rights lawyer, which automatically gives him shit tons of points from me for doing something that mattered and where he could quickly make the most difference and his voting record and co-sponsored bills and stuff are quite good and quite consistent both in the state and national legislature), I'm also of the mindset that his rhetoric is him playing politics. I truly believe this guy will fight and will be savvy as hell if elected. I think he knows the election cycle is a bit of a show and I wish he showed depth more often but there are speeches he has made (I believe especially the one at google- which was when I finally gave in to supporting him) that show his thought-out, progressive policies. HE KNOWS he can't beat Hilary on the experience thing in the big media circus, and so plays up on his own narrative. I think electing Obama would be such an important change in American politics. I think Clinton would be a pretty good president, but I think Obama has the potential to be a PHENOMENAL president that impassions much more people to get involved, changes political funding, and shakes up the establishment a bit- by showing that new politics can finally finally work. I think electing Hilary would just keep the fucking elitist, centrist circle jerk going indefinitely.

ok i think that's enough for now.

PS here's the link to the Candidates at Google speech/interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4yVlPqeZwo

Post a comment




(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)